# Types: Type Refinement

A supertype has one or more subtypes, and while any operation permitted on a value of some supertype is also permitted on a value of any of
its subtypes, the reverse is not true. For example, the type `num`

is a supertype of `int`

and `float`

, and while addition and subtraction are
well defined for all three types, bit shifting requires integer operands. As such, a `num`

cannot be bit-shifted directly. (Similar situations
occur with `arraykey`

and its subtypes `int`

and `string`

, with nullable types and their subtypes, and with `mixed`

and its subtypes.)

Certain program elements are capable of changing the type of an expression using what is called *type refinement*. Consider the following:

```
function f1(?int $p): void {
// $x = $p % 3; // rejected; % not defined for ?int
if ($p is int) { // type refinement occurs; $p has type int
$x = $p % 3; // accepted; % defined for int
}
}
```

When the function starts execution, `$p`

contains `null`

or some `int`

. However, the type of the expression `$p`

is not known to be `int`

, so
it is not safe to allow the `%`

operator to be applied. When the test `is int`

is applied to `$p`

, a type refinement occurs in
which the type of the expression `$p`

is changed to `int`

**for the true path of the if statement only**. As such, the

`%`

operator can
be applied. However, once execution flows out of the `if`

statement, the type of the expression `$p`

is `?int`

.Consider the following:

```
function f2(?int $p): void {
if (\is_null($p)) { // type refinement occurs; $p has type null
// $x = $p % 3; // rejected; % not defined for null
} else { // type refinement occurs; $p has type int
$x = $p % 3; // accepted; % defined for int
}
}
```

The first assignment is rejected, not because we don't know `$p`

's type, but because we know its type is not `int`

. See how an opposite
type refinement occurs with the `else`

. Similarly, we can write the following:

```
function f3(?int $p): void {
if (!\is_null($p)) { // type refinement occurs; $p has type int
$x = $p % 3; // accepted; % defined for int
}
if ($p is nonnull) { // type refinement occurs; $p has type int
$x = $p % 3; // accepted; % defined for int
}
}
```

Consider the following example that contains multiple selection criteria:

```
function f4(?num $p): void {
if (($p is int) || ($p is float)) {
// $x = $p**2; // rejected
}
}
```

**An implementation is not required to produce the correct type refinement when using multiple criteria directly.**

The following constructs involve type refinement:

- When used as the controlling expression in an
`if`

,`while`

, or`for`

statement, the operators`==`

,`!=`

,`===`

, and`!==`

when used with one operand of`null`

,`is`

, and simple assignment`=`

. [Note that if`$x`

is an expression of some nullable type, the logical test`if ($x)`

is equivalent to`if ($x is nonnull)`

.] - The operators
`&&`

,`||`

, and`?:`

. - The intrinsic function
`invariant`

. - The library functions
`is_array`

,`is_bool`

,`is_float`

,`is_int`

,`is_resource`

, and`is_string`

.

Thus far, all the examples use the value of an expression that designates a parameter (which is a local variable). Consider the following case, which involves a property:

```
class C {
private ?int $p = 8; // holds an int, but type is ?int
public function m(): void {
if ($this->p is int) { // type refinement occurs; $this->p1 is int
$x = $this->p << 2; // allowed; type is int
$this->n(); // could involve a permanent type refinement on $p
// $x = $this->p << 2; // disallowed; might no longer be int
}
}
public function n(): void { /* ... */ }
}
```

Inside the true path of the `if`

statement, even though we know that `$this->p1`

is an `int`

to begin with, once any method in this class
is called, the implementation must assume that method could have caused a type refinement on anything currently in scope. As a result,
the second attempt to left shift is rejected.